Saturday, May 26, 2007

Telling All???

John has written an interesting blog today over at Smulospace. How personal should one get about their life on a blogsite? Most of what I have seen in the Emerging/Missional blogsites centers around ideas, beliefs, and book reviews. Sometimes someone may get intensely personal about their own experiences. But it seems fairly uncommon. Sometimes someone may rant and rave over a particular issue or pet peeve. And then there are many blogsites I've perused that read rather like a diary, but usually pretty light-hearted. I guess I haven't seen a lot of mixing going on. But when a blogger is going through a particulary tough time, a personal crisis, tragedy, or duress, how honest should they get? I suppose this is up to each individual.

When we are really under the gun, it is important that we not stand alone. This is the time when the devil can really pick at us if we bear all the burden of trial upon our own shoulders. The Bible commands us to bear one another's burdens and thus fulfill the law of Christ. This isn't only about my willingness to shoulder someone else's pain, but my willingness to reach out for help when I'm in pain, as well.

But there is a deep core of fear in most people's hearts that opening up honestly and sharing our burdens will make us vulnerable to rejection, ridicule, and even betrayal. Many who grew up in dysfunctional homes can well identify with the experience of being shamed or humiliated when as a child they may have tried to express something tender, or sensitive, or sentimental. Others of us may have experienced this as adults, on the job, or, unfortunately, even in our marriages. Precedent dictates that it seems safer to hide our pain.

Recovery teaches me, however, that I need to disclose my real self, to be honest with God, myself, and to another human being, and perhaps to several people. The trick is to find a safe place in which to do so. In most 12-step recovery meetings, there are rules that are in place to create this safety, rules such as anonymity, confidentiality, no cross-talking, judging, or advice giving. I have personally found that when these rules are in place, respected by all and followed (or enforced), the meeting becomes an incredible place for healing. Where they are absent, the possibility of further trial or harm becomes likely.

On the web, then, on blogsites, the question is, "how safe is it to disclose?" Some may bare their souls and may find they are not alone. Some may feel it is worth the repercussions. And some may feel quite wary. If we think this, then let us quickly seek out other safe places to share our burdens and trials. If we don't have any resources available, then we should at least start by emailing someone we think we can trust and see if they are willing to dialogue privately. And let us not feel like we are unqualified to teach, blog, share, or explain on our blogsites, even if we are going through a hard time. It is important to keep talking. At least I have found this in my own experiences in life.

Finally, I want to note that many of us experience the love, respect, and camaraderie of others when we are giving something good and valuable, when we're strong and well. But let us not forget that deep down in our hearts, there is an ache, a genuine need to be loved, accepted, and even esteemed, when we are hurting or not doing well. One will never know the depth of true love when one hides themselves in the time of need. When we are hurting, and when we risk disclosure, we will find a love that goes far beyond the love we get when all is going well.

7 comments:

Jon said...

Hi Steve, great post. I've been sharing with John Smulo for a little while - great guy. I'm interested in what you have to say. I'm involved at an addiction centre once a week that our church is heavily involved with. I get so much out of being there, far more than I could ever give. The livingroom is abstinence based and sees about 70-80% of clients get free. A lot come along to church finding Jesus to be their higher power. Livingroom reviews steps 1-5 but recommend the clients also attend AA or the appropriate fellowship and get a sponsor. They've got loads of elements to their 'programme.'

While I'm there I see a way of being church that the church needs to learn from - that's why I'd like to dialogue with you a bit. I think church should look more like a group for life. Discipleship, Mission, celebration - it's all there.

As for this post: I'm all for more openness. I blog at http://jon.lifeshapedfaith.com . We'll share all kinds of stuff. Just family. Issues we face due to our son being on the autistic spectrum. Book reviews. Frustrations. Days out etc. I know from my stats that the whole world isn't interested. :(

There are limits. Someone made a comment of Johns blog about 'days when he was attracted to women other than his wife.' John commented that he shouldn't have said that - although I wasn't sure it was confessional, maybe more conceptual. But that is the kind of stuff where I think a line has been crossed. It's not like approaching a friend or groups for help, but it kind of suggests that this is normal and ok, when it's not. That's the kind of thing we need to be careful about - we should use the public forum to set better standards, not lower them, and as a place to connect people relationally.

Joseph Myers has some great social analysis of how people move between public, social, personal and intimate spaces in 'The search to belong.' This is a helpful book that could be translated for internet based communication.

All for now. Sorry if a lot of this was off subject - I don't have an email for you. Jon

RCM- Steve said...

Jon,

Thanks for stopping by. I'm excited to share with you your experiences, especially what you are doing with the the Livingroom. Working with recovering people has had a monumental impact on my life and my faith.

And thanks for your responses to this post. Setting a good/high standard on the internet is important. Perhaps, then, deep disclosure is first or best done in a safe place in the real world??.

Agent B said...

Howdy friend.

There's probably not a cookie-cutter answer to "should we post personal problems on-line". Each case is different.

I suppose if your readers all all truly close friends, then you should share just like you would in person.

But all blogs have lurkers out there that might not have a sympathetic heart.

I had some anonymous comments once that criticized me of being lazy for not going out and getting a job. It was really funny to me. And I'm confident in my calling, so some anonymous jackass won't make me lose sleep.

But others might not fair well with anonymous criticism.

Guess it's up to the writer.

But yes, share with your friends and reach for help .

Unknown said...

Hi Steve, it is a good question - personally I air on the side of being very honest in my blog when I write about me - i know even that version gets air brushed by me to look good, but i'd rather be honest with my struggles and talk about them openly - for me it is an important part of the emerging conversation that we can be honest with each other, and I include my blogging in that.

I try and be sensitive and not talk about anyone else but me when i do get personal - share for me rather than for others is my rule of thumb :)

RCM- Steve said...

agent b brother,

Right now I know people who are hurting and I wish we could all pray for them. But I respect their right to disclose if and when they feel it is appropriate. Some hold back for privacy sake, some for fear's sake, some out of respect for others.

I tend to want to lean on the side of disclosure for this reason: there's so much wonderful conversation & insight being presented in so many emerging people's posts, I would tend to trust them more than many people in the church world that I know. Yes, there is a risk of lurkers and anonymous jackasses even in the blogosphere, but the people I've been reading & commenting on seem like high quality brothers and sisters (like yourself!) and I would covet their love, prayers, and care during a hard time.

I do know that on sensitive stuff I would personally use email instead of blogging. And if I was very secure in my calling, like you, I would probably be more personal in my blog, and wouldn't give a crap what negative responses came in.

Stay cool agent brother man!

RCM- Steve said...

Thanks Paul for your insights and thoughts on this matter. I really admire your level of disclosure and honesty. You have risked a lot of rejection for the sake of being loved for who you are, good and bad.

And I definitely think this sphere of disclosure is vital to the whole emerging and missional conversation. It is time for a new level of humility and transparency in the church if we are going to reach today's generation of people. The high-flown productions, and the slick gloss-overs of fallen leaders only point to the work of other men. I can't much see the reachable, tangible Jesus in so many of these "Christian" productions. I hunger for what is real, and I know many others who want that too.

Anonymous said...

Steve, I do feel that it is important to reach out, be transparent and ask for help from those I feel are safe to confide my secrets. I have learned in my 12-step program to take care of myself, which also tells me to use wisdom in choosing the people I share my secrets.

I think blogging is useful and has stimulated my thinking, but I personally have been too fearful to start one of my one. I also feel it can be dangerous to share sensitive information on a blog site. However, I agree that it is for our well being to ask for help and e-mail is more private and personal. I prefer to ask for help in person, telephone next and e-mail third.

This is a good post.